Richard Branson plans low-priced iPad-only magazine

fe745a45-365a-4346-95ef-048337c3851eWired reports that Richard Branson, owner of the Virgin conglomerate, announced plans for an iPad magazine, Maverick (headed by his daughter Holly), which will have no printed counterpart the way many other iPad magazines do. Branson thinks this will be an advantage in terms of marketability:

AdAge’s insiders (via Columbia Journalism Review) said Richard Branson thinks his iPad-only Maverick magazine will have a big advantage over traditional publications when it launches in the fall because it lacks a paper version. By Branson’s logic, the publishers of print magazines cannot price their digital versions low enough, because they don’t want to compete with their higher-priced print editions.

(Amusingly, Wired takes pains to point out in the very next paragraph that this isn’t always the case, given that Wired makes magazine content free on the web—but then admits in the very next sentence that it will be cutting back on that content as part of its new focus on the iPad.)

Certainly one major complaint about most iPad editions of magazines so far has been how overpriced they all tend to be. Branson might well be onto something.

Wired points out that the iPad’s multimedia capabilities represent a considerable advantage to magazine publishers over the Kindle’s “just-like-a-book” display. Magazines have long been about wowing the consumer with lots of color and slick, glossy pages—exactly the kind of thing that the Kindle can’t do.

In the rest of the article, Wired mentions some writers who have experimented with publishing magazine-like multimedia editions of their books, and then gripes for several paragraphs about Apple’s rejection of Flash, which meant Wired had to have Adobe create a separate edition of its magazine for the iPad. (Really, guys, Flash on the iPad is just not going to happen for the foreseeable future. Get over it.)

2 Comments on Richard Branson plans low-priced iPad-only magazine

  1. Flash is *never* going to happen on iOS devices. The first version of Flash for phones like Android is exactly what you’d expect from Adobe given it’s history on non-Windows platforms – slow, buggy, resource hungry, battery draining, crash prone and late, very very late.

    Google are going to regret getting into bed with Adobe over Flash, it’s going to hurt Android and upset customers. It’s clear Google don’t really believe in a future for Flash, they just did it to thumb their noses at Apple and try to get some positive press, meanwhile they’re pushing HTML 5 and JavaScript as hard as Apple and the rest of the industry.

  2. After Steve Jobs insisted Apple would never do another PDA-like device, then came out with the iPhone and iPod Touch, then insisted Apple would never get into e-books, then came out with iBooks, I’ve learned never to say never about anything where Apple is concerned.

The TeleRead community values your civil and thoughtful comments. We use a cache, so expect a delay. Problems? E-mail newteleread@gmail.com.

wordpress analytics