MobileRead DRM poll: Many savvy e-bookers are bypassing 'protection' hassles despite DMCA law

As the person who started the poll in question, I was rather shocked by the high numbers of people who broke the DRM. My personal preference is essentially a boycott on publishers who use DRM’d materials. Between free sources and non-DRM’d books, there is plenty go keep most readers busy for the rest of their lives. Six months or a year, I would hope, would be enough to show the publishers that they are only hurting themselves by using DRM.

One of the thing that worries me most about DCMA and the Sonny Bono Copyright Extension act is that it is causing many to develop a very casual attitude about the real needs and benefits of copyright (When copy right is properly limited). I personally feel properly limited copyrights would allow most authors to benefit as well as the public– certainly there is no need for copyrights to extend 70 years after the death of the author.

—
Bill

It rather reminds me of an excerpt from one of Thomas Macaulay’s speeches to Parliament, speaking of a law that would have lengthened copyright terms beyond what he felt were proper:

I will only say this, that if the measure before us should pass, and should produce one-tenth part of the evil which it is calculated to produce, and which I fully expect it to produce, there will soon be a remedy, though of a very objectionable kind. Just as the absurd acts which prohibited the sale of game were virtually repealed by the poacher, just as many absurd revenue acts have been virtually repealed by the smuggler, so will this law be virtually repealed by piratical booksellers.

At present the holder of copyright has the public feeling on his side. Those who invade copyright are regarded as knaves who take the bread out of the mouths of deserving men. Everybody is well pleased to see them restrained by the law, and compelled to refund their ill-gotten gains. No tradesman of good repute will have anything to do with such disgraceful transactions. Pass this law: and that feeling is at an end. Men very different from the present race of piratical booksellers will soon infringe this intolerable monopoly. Great masses of capital will be constantly employed in the violation of the law. Every art will be employed to evade legal pursuit; and the whole nation will be in the plot.

On which side indeed should the public sympathy be when the question is whether some book as popular as Robinson Crusoe, or the Pilgrim’s Progress, shall be in every cottage, or whether it shall be confined to the libraries of the rich for the advantage of the great-grandson of a bookseller who, a hundred years before, drove a hard bargain for the copyright with the author when in great distress?

Remember too that, when once it ceases to be considered as wrong and discreditable to invade literary property, no person can say where the invasion will stop. The public seldom makes nice distinctions. The wholesome copyright which now exists will share in the disgrace and danger of the new copyright which you are about to create. And you will find that, in attempting to impose unreasonable restraints on the reprinting of the works of the dead, you have, to a great extent, annulled those restraints which now prevent men from pillaging and defrauding the living.