Publishers Lunch (subscription required) is reporting that Ingram may have to stop wholesaling ebooks until new agreements are reached with publishers who want to use the agency model. Ingram has told publishers that this may happen by April 1. If publishers want to change the model from that which has been used for the last 10 years then Ingram will have to come to new arrangements with each publisher individually.
Part of the problem is that, in the agency model, the 30% seller’s commission will not change if a wholesaler is involved. This means that Ingram and its publisher clients have to come to a new arrangement about how to allocate revenues. The article reports that only Random House, who has not moved to the agency model, is unaffected. Among others, Ingram supplies Powells.com, Diesel ebooks and BooksonBoard.
I’m curious how if at all this would affect their Myilibrary platform they have for the Higher Ed crowd. I don’t imagine the higher ed pubs going to the agency model, maybe some will because many of them are owned by the same companies that are using the agency model for their consumer fiction and other titles. Anyone have any info on how this might affect higher ed pubs that deal with ingram digital?
Erik
This does not apply to Ingram’s Core Source EPub DISTRIBUTION program to platforms and devices like Kindle, Nook Sony,and iPad/iPhone/ but only to Ingram’s role as WHOLESALER for certain pubishers and retail accounts.
Please explain to me the concept of a “wholesaler” when it comes to digital content.
It’s astonishing to see the degree to which these people try to cling to their existing physical model when dealing with the new world of digital media.
Wholesalers provide hosting services and lines of credit to help the industry grow and help publishers bring their product to market. Without distributors, the eBook industry may have died in the middle of the last decasde when barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, and Amazon all left the business and hundreds of thousands of customers ebook shelves were deleted. Distributors like Overdrive and Ingram funded the industry and kept the flame alive, recruiting and supporting retailers like BooksOnBoard, Powells, and Fictionwise. The relationship is symbiotic, providing focused skills in distribution form the distributors and focused merchandising and customer service skills from the retailers. BooksOnBoard dual sources from both Overdrive and Ingram. If Ingram doesn’t play because of the agency model, BooksOnBoard will have product from Overdrive and from publishers with whom we work directly. (These do NOT include the 5 publishers that will require fixed eBook prices as of next Thursday.) Let’s be fair to the distributors: as of Thursday afternoon, March 25, the 5 publishers still do not have all the necessary info to the distributors for cut over to new system – items such as sales tax nexus (because, under the new model, they will now require sales tax where the publisher has nexus/locations), ONIX feeds of the changed metadata that includes the new Required Ebook Pricing (REP), and rules for promotion, etc. These things require more than a few days notice to code and test for well over 100,000 titles. So we and others may not have all titles on April 1, but we’ll still have over 200,000 to choose from, including thousands from our top publishers Random House, Harlequin and Samhain, none of whom are playing in this new pricing game. The distributors problem has nothing to do with clinging to old systems. It has everything to do with publishers, desperate for better profits in these hard times, trying to force a change on very short notice. This is a change that increases prices for consumers – many nearly doubling in street price with this change – eliminating by mandate all discounts and rewards programs for the 5 publishers’ titles in an effort to create a somewhat surreal level playing field. Unfortunately, the 5 publishers have chosen as of this writing to push this program through without having the plan fully spelled out. Even if they spelled it out tonight, that still leaves only 5 days for major systems changes and testing. We’re told this is in order to both meet the deadline for the Apple iPad’s release in early April in order to deliver a message to the two other multi-billion dollar giants that have been selling below cost (Amazon and Barnes & Noble). The iPad, interestingly, is a product that our in-house surveys indicate 90%+ of our customers will never touch because they view it as impractical, incredibly expensive and targeted at the very affluent – unlike 98% of all readers who are working extra hard to make ends meet these days. And why would a typical reader, with household income of less than $60k during these hard times, spend up to $800 to read a $7 eBook. BooksOnBoard will continue with our discounts and rewards for all other publishers and offer the 5 publishers’ titles at the Required Ebook Price (REP) when the publishers get their program together and deployed through the distributors. Meanwhile, the Required Pricing scheme guarantees Apple – anything but a struggling company – huge margins on eBooks, raises consumer prices (including forcing sales tax to be charged in approximately 24 states where it is not typically charged for eBooks today), and squeezing out many of the independent ebook stores that rely on Ingram for product. Unfortunately, the agency pricing scheme turns consumers wallets and small independents into collateral damage to “friendly” fire. End result will be to further concentrate economic power, including the selection of who gets published and promoted, in the hands of a few multi-billion dollar behemoths and drastically inhibit the free enterprise that in the last decade encouraged eBook pioneers like Baen, Overdrive, BooksOnBoard and others to keep eBooks alive during years when high-flying Barnes & Noble and Amazon both abandoned the business and hundred of thousands of customers ebook shelves to address quarterly earnings objectives. BooksOnBoard will, in fact, come through this intact, but many of our peers will not. And our typical customer’s choices will be diminished by significant price increases. Neither of these are good things for customers, authors (who get no additional royalties from the increased prices), or the industry over the long run. Over the months and years to come, as eBook adoption advances, we can expect actions like this – if unchecked – to result not only in the closing of some of our ebook store competitors, but also in the closing of traditional independent print bookstores around the globe. For those of us that love to browse the likes of BookPeople in Austin, Oxford Books in Atlanta, City Lights in San Francisco, Tattered Cover in Denver, and more – those will be very sad days. And, as a footnote, most eBook readers also like to read print books as well. In 2009, our active eBook customers who had been with us since 2008 or earlier purchased on average 20 eBooks and 21 print books. Print’s not dead. It just has a companion.